Head-to-Head Comparison
Amazon Leo vs OneWeb (Eutelsat)
Side-by-side comparison of speeds, latency, pricing, coverage, and hardware - updated 2026-03-28.
Data sourced from FCC filings, official specs, and independent speed tests. Upcoming provider specs are based on announced projections.
The Verdict
OneWeb (Eutelsat) is available now with proven real-world performance (50-195 Mbps download, 30-70ms latency), while Amazon Leo has not yet launched consumer service. OneWeb (Eutelsat) is the clear choice today if you need satellite internet now. Amazon Leo promises up to 1000 Mbps but will need time to build out its constellation and prove reliability.
Winner for most users
Amazon Leo
Amazon's LEO broadband - launching 2026
Max Speed
1000 Mbps
Latency
20-40ms
From
TBD
Satellites
212
LEO connectivity for enterprise and government
Max Speed
195 Mbps
Latency
30-70ms
From
TBD
Satellites
654
Amazon Leo vs OneWeb (Eutelsat) - Full Specs Comparison
| Spec | Amazon Leo | OneWeb (Eutelsat) |
|---|---|---|
| Download Speed | 100-1000 Mbps Winner | 50-195 Mbps |
| Upload Speed | 10-40 Mbps Winner | 10-32 Mbps |
| Latency Lower is better | 20-40ms Winner | 30-70ms |
| Starting Price Lower is better | TBD | TBD |
| Data Caps | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Equipment Cost Lower is better | TBD | TBD |
| Installation | Self-install Winner | Professional required |
| Portable | Yes Winner | No |
| Orbit Type | LEO | LEO |
| Constellation | 212 in orbit / 7,736 planned | 654 in orbit / 654 planned Winner |
| Countries Available | 5 countries | 50+ countries Winner |
| Status | Upcoming | Available now Winner |
Speed Comparison - Amazon Leo vs OneWeb (Eutelsat)
Amazon Leo offers faster download speeds at 100-1000 Mbps compared to OneWeb (Eutelsat)'s 50-195 Mbps. That is up to 5.1x faster at the high end.
Upload speeds: Amazon Leo 10-40 Mbps vs OneWeb (Eutelsat) 10-32 Mbps. Speeds are advertised ranges and vary by location, time of day, and congestion.
Latency Comparison - Amazon Leo vs OneWeb (Eutelsat)
Amazon Leo has significantly lower latency at 20-40ms vs OneWeb (Eutelsat)'s 30-70ms - roughly 1.7x lower. This is primarily due to LEO vs LEO orbit differences.
Lower latency is better. Under 80ms is good for gaming. Under 300ms works for video calls. GEO satellites (35,786 km) have 600ms+ latency due to signal travel time. LEO satellites (550 km) achieve 20-60ms.
Pricing Comparison - Amazon Leo vs OneWeb (Eutelsat)
Neither provider has announced public consumer pricing. Both may be enterprise-only or still in pre-launch phase.
Amazon Leo Plans
Amazon targeting $400 consumer terminal; Leo Nano even cheaper
OneWeb (Eutelsat) Plans
Enterprise pricing through authorized partners
Coverage & Availability - Amazon Leo vs OneWeb (Eutelsat)
OneWeb (Eutelsat) has broader availability with service in 50+ countries vs Amazon Leo's 5. Full 654-satellite constellation complete. Global coverage. 440 next-gen satellites ordered (Jan-Feb 2026, €1B financing, first 100-sat batch delivery end 2026). $5.8B debt refinancing completed March 6, 2026. Also contracted 264 IRIS2 LEO satellites at €2.1B for EU sovereign connectivity program.
Showing featured countries on our site. OneWeb (Eutelsat) operates in 50+ countries total.
Both available (4)
Amazon Leo only (1)
OneWeb (Eutelsat) only (13)
Hardware & Installation - Amazon Leo vs OneWeb (Eutelsat)
Amazon Leo offers self-installation while OneWeb (Eutelsat) requires a professional installer.
Amazon Leo
- Equipment
- TBD
- Dish Type
- Phased-array (compact form factor)
- Installation
- Self-install
- Portable
- Yes
Amazon targeting $400 consumer terminal; Leo Nano even cheaper
OneWeb (Eutelsat)
- Equipment
- TBD
- Dish Type
- Electronically steered antenna
- Installation
- Professional
- Portable
- No
Enterprise pricing through authorized partners
Pros & Cons
Amazon Leo
Advantages
- + Amazon's $10B+ investment ensures long-term commitment
- + Three terminal tiers up to 1 Gbps (Leo Ultra)
- + Potential Prime subscription bundle
- + FCC expanded authorization to 7,736 satellites (Jan 2026)
- + Enterprise preview already running
Limitations
- - No confirmed consumer pricing yet
- - Only ~212 of 7,736 satellites in orbit so far; FCC deadline extension pending
- - Years behind Starlink in operational experience
OneWeb (Eutelsat)
Advantages
- + Complete LEO constellation - fully operational globally
- + Low latency (30–70ms) competitive with Starlink
- + Strong government and military contracts
- + Next-gen 5G-integrated satellites in production
Limitations
- - No direct consumer offerings - enterprise only
- - Pricing not publicly available
- - Requires authorized partner for access
- - Smaller constellation than Starlink
Which Should You Choose? Amazon Leo vs OneWeb (Eutelsat)
Gaming
Amazon LeoAmazon Leo's 20-40ms latency beats OneWeb (Eutelsat)'s 30-70ms for competitive gaming.
Streaming
Amazon LeoAmazon Leo's higher max speeds (100-1000 Mbps) support more simultaneous streams, though OneWeb (Eutelsat) (50-195 Mbps) also handles 4K fine.
Budget
NeitherNeither provider has announced consumer pricing yet.
Rural / Remote
OneWeb (Eutelsat)OneWeb (Eutelsat) is available in 50+ countries vs Amazon Leo's 5, offering broader rural coverage globally.
Business
OneWeb (Eutelsat)OneWeb (Eutelsat) offers dedicated business plans. Amazon Leo does not have specific business tiers.
Mobile / RV
Amazon LeoAmazon Leo supports portable use - great for RVs, boats, and travel. OneWeb (Eutelsat) requires a fixed installation.